Updated for new ruff linting codes

pyproject.toml

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ exclude = ["docs/", "tests/"]
 # Configure ruff to be *heavily* opinionated. We want to enforce a consistent style across all code.
 # Enable checks for pydocstyle (`D`), pycodestyle (`E`, `W`), Pyflakes (`F`), McCabe Complexity (C90)
 # isort (`I`), pep8 naming (`N`), flake8 (`A`, `ANN`, `B`, `C4`, `EM`, `FBT`, `ICN`, `INT`, `ISC`, `PT`,
-# `PTH`, `RET`, `SIM`, `TCH`, and `TID`), perflint (`PERF`), numpy rules (`NPY`), pandas
+# `PTH`, `RET`, `SIM`, `TC`, and `TID`), perflint (`PERF`), numpy rules (`NPY`), pandas
 # rules (`PD`), pylint (`PL`), ruff rules (`RUF`).
 select = [
     "D",
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ select = [
     "PTH",
     "RET",
     "SIM",
-    "TCH",
+    "TC",
     "TID",
     "PERF",
     "NPY",
@@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ select = [
 #       is unenforceable in such a data-heavy library.
 # - PLR0914: same as above.
 # - PLR0917: same as above.
-# - TCH001: the `TYPE_CHECKING` blocks either don't work or i'm too stupid to get them to work.
-# - TCH002: same as above.
-# - TCH003: same as above.
+# - TC001: the `TYPE_CHECKING` blocks either don't work or i'm too stupid to get them to work.
+# - TC002: same as above.
+# - TC003: same as above.
 # - ISC001: Personally, i really like this rule but apparently it can cause issues with the ruff formatter.
 ignore = [
     "PD002",
@@ -111,9 +111,9 @@ ignore = [
     "PLR0913",
     # "PLR0914",
     # "PLR0917",
-    "TCH001",
-    "TCH002",
-    "TCH003",
+    "TC001",
+    "TC002",
+    "TC003",
     "ISC001",
 ]
 # Allow autofix for all enabled rules (when `--fix`) is provided.
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ fixable = [
     "RUF",
     "SIM",
     "SLF",
-    "TCH",
+    "TC",
     "TID",
     "TRY",
     "UP",